Xiaomi MiMo v2.6

Read the linked article.


Discuss on Hacker News

Finally a lab that doesn’t cheat on the charts

Wow, the chinese labs are getting good at advertising model releases. The moat is thin.

Some features of the release I like:

  • Demonstration of diverse tasks, such as using a DAW

  • Graphs from various benchmarks and price ranges

  • Real world use of the model in scientific environments

ah, would you look at that. I was wondering why mimo 2.5 became “dumber” the last weeks. I was speculating they are probably about to release a new version of the model. because the model really acted out a lot. especially the last two weeks. dont know, was just a feeling, highly speculative.

but now I got my “proof”.

This looks great in terms of cost and capabilities, truly pushing the frontier forward in terms of open weight light weight models.

This is a big week. Probably getting next OpenAI and Anthro models, Grok 4.7, Mimo, etc. These open source model releases are why I can’t take the “slow down” crowd seriously. I pitted older Mimo, qwen, step, gpt-oss, and other models against each other playing games like Werewolf and Sketch.io-like games where I let them talk shit while they played against each other. Mimo was by far pareto frontier of game-playing for the models that were <$0.15/m input tokens on OpenRouter. Qwen was pareto frontier in the shit talking game though. Qwen’s hilarious. https://www.tiktok.com/@clankerfights/video/7642862917582425…

Looking at the frontend design examples; why do these models seem to love the “01 - UPPERCASE TEXT” motif. It’s everywhere now (see https://try.cloudflare.com/, which has ‘01 · QUICK TUNNELS’, but no “02” anywhere).

It’s a big company, like Microsoft or Google. Some of their products are good and some are bad.

I know we have strong views on what a truly open model is (open weights, open training data, open training code etc.) but I really like how transparent they’ve been about the training of this model.

The realtime dashboard they shared during training (https://mimo.xiaomi.com/rl/) was an incredible learning and teaching tool for me, and they’ve been unusually comprehensive in sharing details about their methodology (check out that tech report - it’s got lots of clever behind the scene tricks like Google or Deepseek writeups) and benchmark scores (even the stuff they didn’t do well on).

If you’re releasing an open model going forward, please consider offering the community more of this transparency!

Flash1: 309B total / 15B activated parameters

Pro 2:, 1.02T total / 42B activated parameters

All these new models are such tease for us folks with 128GB of shared memory. Buying another unit now to expand to 256GB is a mortgage payment but it’s getting tempting…

I guess that would only be possible if your provider was Xiaomi itself?

They mixed up DeepSeek 4.1 Flash with something else on this page, possibly DeepSeek 4.1 Flash means Gemini 3.8 Flash.

does anyone know what unnamed model is on paretto frontier picture right between MiMo 2.5 and 2.6?

so weird to acknowledge someone being on the front edge, but not name it

My guess is that by function they break down frontend sections or components into pieces and I believe document things for themselves on some level, or purposely are verbose in this way. It is probably also shaped by users and existing web patterns. They probably get reinforced by models the more common they become.

Nice catch!

As for the stats that everyone wants:

MiMo-V2.6-Flash-310B-A15B roughly GPT-5.6 Luna / Claude 4.9 according to benchmarks MiMo-V2.6-Pro-1.02T-A42B roughly GPT-5.6 Sol / Opus 5 according to benchmarks

Perhaps with IQ2 flash will run on 128G M5?

It’s funny, I have the exact opposite reaction. This is probably misguided on my part, but Xiaomi is one of the very few major tech companies that I don’t have an immediate strong negative reaction to. Everything I’ve bought from them, from robot vacuum to mobile phone, has been reasonably well designed, didn’t break, and was priced fairly. I also think their car looks badass.

I’m sure they’re doing all kinds of terrible things, like all major companies. I just can’t help but like them. Also, this model looks great, and I’ll give their subscription a shot next month.

I still have a xiaomi mi 11 lite, my wife has a 15t. The cameras are the best for the price. The way they chove ads down your throat at every opportunity should be illegal though

I really liked MiMo 2.5, it was really affordable and actually had vision, unlike DeepSeek. (DeepSeek has only recently added it)

Just tried 2.6 flash on a really niche topic I specialise in and it has done a really good job. They’ve definitely polluted their training data with claudeslop, but looking past the slop there is a decent model.